01
Important-page coverage
Compare the URLs the client cares about with verified request evidence—not a site-wide activity total.
Combine a client’s sitemap with verified server-side crawler evidence. See where requests fail, which obsolete URLs absorb attention, and which important pages need investigation next.
One client domain · real request evidence · reply within 48 hours
Client evidence record
acme.example · last 14 days
/pricing
Revenue
No verified activity observed during this period
Check internal discovery and keep collecting
/compare/platform-x
Evaluation
GPTBot · 14 requests
Review edge policy and rate limiting
/old-ai-guide
Obsolete
OAI-SearchBot · 31 requests
Align sitemap, redirect, and canonical target
The combined workflow
Neither tells an agency what matters on its own. SeeLLM joins the client’s important URL inventory with verified crawler requests and a bounded next action.
01
Compare the URLs the client cares about with verified request evidence—not a site-wide activity total.
02
Surface repeated blocks, rate limits, server failures, redirects, and policy conflicts with the observation attached.
03
Find obsolete URLs receiving requests while current pricing, product, or comparison pages receive none in the same window.
The core screen
Every recommendation stays attached to the page, source, time window, and condition that supports it.
From connection to decision
01
Use the existing SeeLLM collector or share a bounded request-log sample.
02
Map the client’s URL inventory and select the pages that matter commercially.
03
Verify crawler identity, request time, URL, and the response actually observed.
04
Separate healthy coverage from technical failures and pages worth investigating.
05
Make one bounded change, then compare the same evidence source again.
Two-to-four-week validation
Send the domain. We’ll inspect the public sitemap, confirm what real telemetry is available, and reply within 48 hours with the next connection step.